In a large storage facility located in eastern Thailand, close to a significant highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun carefully scrutinizes heaps of disposed electronics—circuit boards, metal scraps, and obsolete computer parts. Every week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry explore unauthorized sites managing electronic waste, gathering samples for lab analysis and regulatory compliance.
Choddaechachainun leads a dedicated task force addressing the country’s growing challenge with electronic waste, or e-waste. Despite routine inspections and raids on these unlicensed processing sites—many hidden in rural regions to avoid scrutiny—the scale of the problem continues to intensify.
Thailand is experiencing the consequences of a shift in global e-waste flows. Historically, countries like China handled the bulk of electronic refuse from wealthier nations, especially the United States and those within the European Union. That changed in 2018, when China instituted a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternatives across Southeast Asia, including Thailand.
Thailand applied its own prohibition on the importation of e-waste in 2020. However, the outcomes have been anything but positive. As reported by Earth Thailand, a nonprofit dedicated to environmental advocacy, the volume of e-waste brought into the country has surged from about 3,000 tons each year prior to the Chinese restriction to nearly 60,000 tons currently.
El constante flujo se debe en parte a la alta rotación de dispositivos electrónicos entre los consumidores occidentales. Las actualizaciones frecuentes de teléfonos inteligentes, computadoras portátiles y otros productos electrónicos—además de la posesión generalizada de grandes electrodomésticos—generan una cantidad considerable de desechos. Aunque existen regulaciones internacionales que buscan evitar la exportación de residuos peligrosos a países en desarrollo, aún hay vacíos legales. Por ejemplo, a menudo los envíos se declaran erróneamente como electrónicos usados destinados a la reventa, solo para ser desmantelados y fundidos al llegar.
The process of recycling comes with considerable environmental hazards. When e-waste reaches Thailand, it is broken down and melted to recover precious materials, including copper and gold. Although this recovery technique is lucrative, it releases hazardous materials like mercury and lead, polluting the air, soil, and water.
Thai officials believe that the majority of collected metals are transported to China, causing environmental and social consequences.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan speaks out regarding the damage these operations inflict. He stresses that the unlawful recycling sector fails to benefit the country’s economy and instead causes harm to local environments and populations. His department has initiated a more intensive effort to close down illegal activities and remove foreign-owned facilities engaged in unlawful practices.
Thailand is regarded as a dumping ground, Promphan observes. “We are dealing with an international waste management practice that provides no benefit to our country and leads to considerable damage.”
The negative impact extends to everyday citizens like Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old farmer in eastern Thailand. He claims that polluted runoff from a nearby smelting facility has hurt his cassava yield, and the stench of burning waste disrupts his sleep. Local activists maintain the smelter is operating illegally and are pressing authorities to intervene.
On a global scale, the implications are sobering. Data from the United Nations indicates that more than 60 million tonnes of e-waste are generated globally each year—double the volume recorded 15 years ago. Forecasts suggest that this figure could rise by over 30% by the end of the decade.
Although the worrying increase continues, only about 20% of global electronic waste is managed using sustainable and environmentally safe techniques. The rest is dumped in landfills or processed in dangerous environments, often in countries lacking strict regulations.
Several countries have implemented laws concerning extended producer responsibility, which make producers responsible for the disposal of their products at the end of their life cycles. Firms like Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being encouraged to create mechanisms for taking back and recycling their products.
Thailand is evaluating a comparable legal framework, with the goal of bolstering local enforcement and decreasing unlawful practices associated with electronic waste management. Promphan is hopeful about its enforcement in the future.
“I am optimistic that we will approve this new legislation shortly—perhaps before this year concludes or at the start of the next,” he mentions. “We require all-encompassing measures to eradicate this unlawful sector and safeguard our citizens and the environment.”
As Thailand moves forward with legal reform and enhances regulation, their actions reflect a smaller aspect of a more extensive issue. Managing electronic waste necessitates worldwide collaboration, clear supply networks, and teamwork between consumers and producers. Without major transformation, the ecological impact of our technological era might surpass its advantages.
